
7
Today’s GPON deployments offer
considerable distance and bandwidth
advantages over previous PON standards.
Some GPON manufacturers provide 2.5
Gbps downstream and 1.2 Gbps upstream and
serve up to 60 km. GPON also offers a few
advantages over active Ethernet solutions.
GPON deployment costs are generally lower.
Also, operating costs savings are gained
since power is not required for components
between the optical line termination (OLT)
and the optical network terminal (ONT) (see
Figure 1). Yeah, save some coal for another
day.
Similar to other PON standards, GPON CPE
units still share the OLT bandwidth, which
is not the case in active Ethernet solutions.
In the PON shared network, each subscriber
must have the same ONT and each subscriber
receives the same bandwidth. This inherent
PON design creates deployment issues
when one subscriber requests additional
bandwidth or when new technology or
firmware is introduced into the network.
The technology or firmware upgrade will
have to be completed for all the CPE units
and the OLT at the same time.
DSL and PON are excellent transitional
solutions to deliver voice, video and data
prior to deploying an active Ethernet FTTx
network. See, we can all just get along. An
active network provides dedicated circuits
to each subscriber from powered Ethernet
routing switches located in the outside plant
(see Figure 2). Active Ethernet provides
higher bandwidths (up to 10 Gbps currently)
and a larger serving area up to 120 km (versus
60 km with GPON). Since every home has
a dedicated circuit, bandwidths can continue
to climb with every advance in Ethernet
switch capability. Active Ethernet is gaining
momentum in FTTx deployments.
I wonder what technology and standards
lie ahead to satisfy our increasing appetite
for bandwidth and immediate demand for
services… stay tuned…
Ethernet Routing
Switch
OSP Enclosure
Drop Cables
Feeder Cable
Gatewa
Ethernet Routing
Switch
Fi
Figure 2 - Active Network
Comentários a estes Manuais